Abstract
As the repercussions of negative coaching behaviour in youth sport are more fully understood, it becomes apparent that a unified code of conduct outlining coaching obligations is necessary. Recently Gervis (2010) suggested that a culture of emotional abuse perpetrated by coaches could be endemic in youth sports, and frequent, repetitive exposure to this type of abuse has serious negative outcomes for participants. Research by Raakman, Dorsch, and Rhind (2010) indicated that 52% of all negative coaching behaviours can be deemed psychologically/emotionally abusive. Currently, expectations regarding coach behaviours are couched in the Codes of Ethics of national/local sport governing bodies, with few provisions for accountability (Duffy, 2010). A further analysis of the XXX comments that allowed Raakman et al. to identify emotionally abusive acts coupled with gaps associated with coaching ethics and responsibilities, have allowed the creation of six coaching obligations. These obligations (Respect the (a) physical, (b) sexual, and (c) psychological integrity of the child; Provide reasonable care, discipline, protection, and attention that meet the needs of players; Model behaviors that support a culture of understanding, peace, tolerance, equality, friendship, and fair play among all people; Protect children from exposure to harmful behaviours) are presented as necessities to which the coach should be held legally, principally, and morally accountable.
