Abstract
Traditionally the successful aging (SA) literature has suggested that engagement with life is comprised of both interpersonal relationships and productive activities (Rowe & Kahn, 1998). Recent work by Liffiton & Weir (2012) suggests that the frequency of participation may be a valid measure of engagement. To compare these, the current study examined 181 community dwelling older adults (mean age = 67.4; 75 male/106 female). An activity profile, an index of chronic conditions, self-reported SA, and physical and cognitive function measures were obtained through self-report. These were used to develop a traditional measure of SA based on Rowe and Kahn's definition. However, two different methods were used to define engagement: 1) interpersonal relationships and productive activities; and 2) frequency of participation in 29 activities over a one week period (1-7 days). Using the more traditional definition of engagement 12.3%of participants were determined to be SA, 78.5% moderately SA, and 2.2% not successfully aging. In contrast, using frequency, no participants were identified as not SA while 20.4% were SA and 79.6% moderately SA. Using frequency as a proxy of engagement sends a strong public health message. Participating in a variety of activities at least one time per week on average makes positive contributions to SA, suggesting that even minimal levels of engagement are beneficial.Acknowledgments: Supported by SSHRC (PLW)